Commitment to transparent functioning

We at Pardarshita strongly feel that while we demand the government departments to be transparent with everyone, we also have a duty of maintaining transparency in terms of our own work, expenditures, funding and so on. So, to re-iterate our commitment towards ethical and pardarshi work, we invite anyone to inspect our books of accounts.
Showing posts with label EWS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label EWS. Show all posts

Wednesday, 1 January 2014

Press release on 'bal sunwai' (public hearing by children) on Right to Education Act on 26 December 2013



More than 500 underprivileged children from various parts of the city gathered at D Block, New Seemapuri today to articulate their grievances against MCD schools and schools run by the Delhi government in a first-of-its-kind ‘bal sunwai’ (public hearing conducted by children). The theme of the sunwai was improper implementation of the Right to Education Act 2009 (RTE) that promises compulsory quality education to children between the age-group of 6-14 years that too free of cost, without any need of documents at the time admission along with provision of school uniform and  books from the side of the government.

In a thickly attended three-hour session, children brought out the difficulties faced by them at school and how helpless their situation gets when it comes to asking for their rights from authority figures, both in and outside school. Children came from places as far as Bawana, Kalkaji, Govindpuri, Kalyanpuri, Badli, Old Seemapuri, New Seemapuri, Rangpur Pahadi, Zafarabad and Sunder Nagari for the sunwai, many of them escorted by their parents.

Shahrukh, a resident of New Seemapuri, complained about how he became unconscious for a few hours and got temporary hearing loss when his teacher, who is a habituated to beating children with a stick, hit him for no reason. He is from the Government Boys Senior Secondary School, J & K Block, Dilshad Garden. Another student complained about how his teachers constantly spoke on mobile phones or just chit-chatted in the staff room instead of taking classes. “When we approach them and demand them to teach us, they shoe us away by saying that netagiri mat karo, chup chap class main baitho,” said Sohail. Teachers showering children with the choicest abuses at the slightest of pretext is another very common experience as shared by many students.

Another boy Sajid complained about his teacher, who prefers to get drunk and sit in the staff room instead of teaching. He is from Government Boys Senior Secondary School, New Seemapuri.  Arun from Government Boys Senior Secondary School Nand Nagari protested, “When we speak up and complain about poor infrastructure in writing, teachers discourage us by threatening us and our parents with cancelling our admission or reducing our grades, so what option do we have other than quietly embracing all the ill-treatment and deprivation of our rights?” 

Kanchan from Sarvodaya Kanya Vidyalaya, New Seemapuri, was angry about safety of girl students. “When we are travelling back from school, boys, who should be inside classrooms in the second shift, stand outside and tease us daily. When we complained to the principal about it, she brushed it aside as if it was a non-issue,” she said.

Chandni, another student from the same school, complained how the teacher made them run around for locating darris to sit on, many times for two periods out of eight! “We try to make arrangements for our own seating instead of studying at school. We have to sit on floor whether in cold winters, hot summers or wet monsoons. How many children can tolerate these hardships continuously?” she questioned. Shehzadi from Sarvodaya Kanya Vidyalaya, E Block, Nand Nagari exposed the level of difficulty faced by children at school when she shared how her teacher asked her to pick a broom and clean the toilets if she felt they were smelly and unusable.

Regarding admission-related issues, Samina, a parent, shared how she ran around for about two years to get her child admitted to school. “We are illiterate and don’t know our rights so the school takes advantage of that and makes unnecessary demands from us to find excuses to refuse our children education,” she said. Shahana, another parent, recollected how only one of her five children got admission to the government school after she ran from pillar to post, that too in class one when her daughter should have been in class five. Her admission was based on a relative’s residence proof despite RTE stipulating that no such documents were required for admission to any child before the age of 14 years.

 

Another boy Sohail from Bawana complained about how he was forced to dirty water from the school water cooler by his teacher that gave him typhoid. Another student shared how girls in her class have a harrowing time dealing with their teachers, who pull their hair routinely and call them ‘characterless’ based on their own mood swings. “It depresses us no end,” she said. 

In the case of children from New Seemapuri resettlement colony, which is the only minority district of Delhi, there are only four government schools they can approach, two schools under the MCD and two under the Delhi Government. This implies that on an average, 100-125 children get stifled into one classroom. “There is a very disproportionate distribution of resources in such a densely populated area. More schools must be provided along with basic infrastructural facilities like clean toilets, clean drinking water, classrooms that have desks and chairs and a committed teaching staff to fulfill the promise of quality education under the RTE,” said Ritu Mehra, co-founder of Pardarshita.
The sunwai was attended by Chairperson of National Commission for Minorities (NCM) Wajahat Habibullah, member of Delhi Commission for Protection of Child Rights (DCPCR) Mamta Sahai, former advisor of the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights and founder of Artha-Astha Radhika Alkazi, Convener of National Right to Education Forum Amrish Rai and many other NGO representatives working on the issue of child rights.


In the opinion of Sahai, since DCPCR is a quasi-judicial body with restricted powers, probably a PIL would make authorities more responsible and accountable while discharging their duties towards children. “If children give us their complaints in writing, we would do everything we can to resolve them,” she promised. Rajiv, founder Pardarshita, however exclaimed that till the time a mechanism for time-bound case disposal at DCPCR is evolved, children’s right to education can never be ensured as precious time gets wasted in paper-work stretching for months, sometimes years.

Shri Habibullah, however sounded more positive. He said that Commissions do have powers of a civil court so cases regarding discrimination of specific communities including violation of their RTE should be brought to their notice and they would certainly take cognizance of the same.

Saturday, 24 December 2011

Delhi schools default on providing information on poor quota

ABHIMANYU SINGH  NEW DELHI | 18th Dec 2011
number of Delhi-based government-aided private schools, including Sanskriti, Delhi Police Public School and Jindal International School, have not provided any information to the Delhi government about the number of children they have admitted under the Economically Weaker Sections quota in the current year. Or they have provided the information considerably late.

Delhi government's Department of Education is mandated to maintain a list of all government aided private schools, along with data on the fulfilment of the EWS quota, on its website, as per a notification issued by the Delhi government. The Right to Education Act stipulates that all government aided private schools should admit 25% children under the EWS quota every year at the entry level.

In the case of Sanskriti, which is run by the wives of Central civil servants, the DoE released the list of children admitted under the EWS quota after a gap of almost six months. The last date for schools to provide the information was 30 July. This development comes after the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights and the Central Information Commission intervened in the matter.
Following a complaint by a city-based RTE activist, Ritu Mehra, the Central Information Commission took note that the schools had not provided the information despite the Delhi government directive ordering the Directorate of Education to collect and publish the data. The schools contested the CIC's order in the Delhi High Court. The court upheld the CIC's order.

In spite of this, Sanskriti did not provide the required information. So the NCPCR had to intervene and ask the school to comply with the order.

A source in the principal's office at Sanskriti said, "We had sent the information to the Directorate of Education. However, complete information could not be sent because of a technical error on our side about which we were not aware. After we got the Commission's letter, we sent the full information again."

The authorities of the Delhi Police Public School and Jindal International School could not be contacted despite several attempts.
RTE activist Ritu Mehra said that she was surprised that many of the children admitted in Sanskriti under the EWS quota came from far-off places. The school is situated in Chankyapuri. "Under the EWS quota it has admitted students who live in Gurgaon, Patel Nagar, IP Extension, Janakpuri and Palam Vihar. It will cost these students at least Rs 1,500 a month on conveyance. I wonder how they can come under the EWS quota," said Mehra.

Some schools contested that they could not fulfil the quota for the current year because of lack of students.

Raj Kamal, the head of administration at Green Valley International School, said that they were not approached by anyone seeking admission under the quota: "We are ready to give admission under the EWS quota. But we received no applications in this regard. How can we admit children in such a circumstance?"

Some other schools claimed that they had sent the data to the Department of Education, but the latter failed to upload the same on its website. Parvati Ramachandran, the head of administration at Florence Public School, said, "We have fulfilled our quota and sent the list to DoE."

Mehra said that the schools employ delaying tactics in order to hide the fact that they have not fulfilled the quota. "It is easy to say that they have fulfilled the quota when they might not have done so. They also wilfully delay sending the information so that it is not uploaded on time," said Mehra.

Saturday, 16 January 2010

Discussion on 'Implementation of EWS Quota' in Public Schools, 15 January, 2010



I am happy to have made it for at least some part of the meeting on 'Implementation of EWS Quota in Public Schools' at ISI, Lodhi Road, organised by Pardarshita, Sajag and Asha Delhi. I walked into a hall full of people from the poor community. Mothers spoke of their struggles with school administration and how it paid off while children spoke of how it feels to be poor, yet to 'fit in' at school with children from a better class. Poor children have made it to schools like GD Goenka and Sanskriti through EWS quota. This meeting was about lots of sharing and lots of bonding between people who have fought similar battles but from different locations. Their fight continues...





Friday, 15 January 2010

Concept Note for Better Education for Economically Weaker Section and use of RTI (2008)

An important area where the poor people are facing problems in Delhi is the education sector. Although this section of the population has access only to government schools, yet it is widely recognized that the quality of education provided in such schools is extremely poor and deficient. This problem becomes worse in resettlement colonies where slum dwellers are shifted as per the needs of the government in the name of urban development. Most resettlement colonies in Delhi lack basic amenities like infrastructure, water, electricity, transportation, employment opportunities and health facilities in the vicinity. The problem of the children is compounded in these areas due to lack of proper schools, and playgrounds.
Education being the fundamental right should be easily available to all the people of the community.
MCD Schools
The schools run by Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) have the principal responsibility with regard to Primary Education in the city of Delhi. There are 6 schools in Old Seema Puri and New Seema Puri, Delhi that are run by the MCD. The economically weaker section depend on these very “MCD Schools” for the education of their children inspite of sad state of affairs of these schools.
A study of the condition and the environment of these schools reveal that:

  1. A student of such school cannot even read nor write in Hindi properly.


  2. Many of the teachers and other staff employed to teach in these schools can often be found anywhere but in the classroom.


  3. The basic infrastructure is often missing in the classrooms.


  4. A class, with a capacity for 40 to 45 students, has 100 to 125 students, squeezed in it. As a result children spend majority of their time either standing during the class or totally skipping it.

The people who are living in these areas belong to the low income strata of the society therefore they are too busy in trying to earn living for their families and are actually left with no time to get the basic education for themselves nor for their family. They lack awareness about their fundamental rights or the facilities, which they are entitled to from the government.

The government does contribute to the education sector by running MCD schools, some institutions are run by Delhi Govt. and there exists some which are known as Public recognized schools in locality/community.
Public Schools
On the other hand Public Schools are presented as non-profit undertakings. But the guardians of students of such Public Schools have reason to believe otherwise; donation worth lakhs of rupees are demanded along with school fees as building fund, cultural fund etc. An average middle class family aspiring to send their children to such schools has to seriously plan their budget and for the rest of us it’s an unattainable dream.
Approximately 397 schools in Delhi have received land from the Government at extremely subsidized rates on the condition that in return these schools would reserve 25% seats for the children of EWS in their schools, a condition continuously violated. The reasons given for not fulfillment of such conditions are that if such children are allowed to enroll in their school, they will destroy the school’s environment that caters to the needs of the elite class of the society. But the real reason for refusing the admissions to EWS is the drastic reduction in income that these schools make through donations.
State Failure
Apart from the schools, three other parties are guilty of violation of the Constitutional Right to education as well as the terms and conditions for allotting land at concessional rates.
• The Delhi Government and Municipal Corporation of Delhi have failed to ensure that all unaided Recognized Private Schools in Delhi (to which public land had been conditionally allotted) complies with the conditions of allotment of land with regard to admission of the children (25 per cent belonging to the EWS of society and grant free ship to them)
• The Delhi Government has further failed to frame rules or policies regarding provision for education to the children belonging to EWS of society by all Unaided recognized private schools in Delhi.
• The Union of India, Delhi Development Authority, Delhi Government and Municipal Corporation of Delhi were also unable to take action against erring unaided recognized private schools for noncompliance with the conditions on which public lands have been allotted to them.
Problems in Utilizing this EWS Clause:
Pressure groups not available
There exists no autonomous body which can exert pressure on the school authorities in case if they deny admission rights to any aspirant form EWS
Insensitive Decisions by judiciary.
The honorable system of judiciary did take efforts to pass the required directives to provide the basic rather a robust system of education to all the children of society. However unfortunately there exists no mechanism to ensure such availability.
Commercialization of education
The education system in our society has been commercialized so much that it has left behind the requirement of a basic good education being available to all the children of society, instead it has become a commodity to be available for haves' and not with have nots'
In societies like ours where the transparency in the system is yet to develop, the general public must learn how to make use of the right to information and government offices and administration must learn how to share information while safeguarding privacy and national interests. For both sides this requires an increased level of awareness of their rights, duties and obligations.
Proposal
The project, which we propose here; shall be a pilot project and will be carried out in the resettlement and slum clusters of Seema Puri in Delhi. The programme shall cater towards an improved state of living for people and will strive to set an example for other areas to replicate.
Strength of our organization
Pardarshita is a non-profit organization registered since December 2005, founded by activists associated with Parivartan. A separate organization has been formed to focus on setting up resource centers in several low-income areas and enabling education for children from low-income families. The main aim is to fight corruption and ensure transparency and accountability in the Public Governance systems thereby empowering the marginalized sections to improve their life conditions. The goal of this organization is to spread awareness about Right to Information and empower common people to use this awareness and the RTI tool to ensure access to his/her rights and entitlements. Being a active member of Parivartan we took the initiative and started with addressing the difficulties faced by people in dealing with the electricity department and further handled the issues like ration card, sewage, roads, water supply and so on. This was an empowering process – right to information has redefined the relationship between the people and the government.
Advocacy Element
Sustenance of free ship quota. The free ship quota earlier was 25% which had been continuously reduced and now it has reached to as low as 10%. We propose that the respective authorities should review their decision again and if not much this free ship should be revived back to 20% atleast.
Implementation of guidelines of Education Department at the grass root level: the people from EWS are neither educated nor aware of the rights available to them being a citizen of India. Therefore there arises a need to spread awareness in the society for the benefit of such people at large. This shall enable them to seek implementation of the guidelines of the respective authorities in their favour e.g the mid day meal which is provided to the children in schools the parents do not know the quantity and the menu for the same. The menu is not displayed on the board.
Facilities which are being sanctioned by the Govt should be made available to the children e.g a process should be formed to reimburse for the books and uniform to parents by the school authorities.
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
Pardarshita shall try to create awareness amongst the common people regarding their rights, duties and obligations being the citizen of India
Pressure groups/Watch groups: Some autonomous bodies should be designated as pressure groups to ensure that all the policies of the policies of the govt are followed not only in the letter but also in the spirit.
Our orgnisation aims to provide the much-needed support to the people living in slums to invoke RTI to use this right to the fullest and establish an effective system of governance. Members of this organization have been engaged in the process for last few years and have been active members of the RTI movement not only in the city but also in the country. The overall objective of this project is to provide a space to the slum communities where they could access information and know-how to use the Right to Information tool.
This tool not only creates awareness amongst the common people but also make govt officials and the community accountable.
Proposed Activities

  • Awareness Camps


  • Help line Number


  • Networking and Advocacy with NGOs


  • Voluntary support by community people


  • Camps organized in different colonies


  • Campaign in collaboration with Delhi Government.


Capacity building activity will focus on developing the understanding of the Community and the NGOs active in the area on accessing information, analyzing the government documents and utilizing the information to assist the admissions/enrollment process. The Capacity building will also focus on the use of Right to Information, studying the information accessed and putting it to use in understanding government processes to complete paper work for school admissions. In 2005 when we started working on EWS clause we were able to admit around 45 children in different schools of northeast district. In next year i.e. 2006 around 150 children were admitted, and in current year more than 400 children were admitted in 4 districts.

Expected Results
• Awareness among the parents, children and the schools.

• Working towards realizing the goal ‘Education for All’.

• Creating a Network with NGOs to formulate a future plan of action and organize opinion to influence policy level intervention.

• It tries to abridge the wide gap that exists between the two sides of Indian society– the haves and the have-nots – the problem of heterogeneity is also taken care.

• We have acted as catalysts in the correction of the system. On one hand the Deputy Director Education, some school principals have become receptive and on the other, there is awareness of the presence of the clause. For AY 2008-09 more parents reached out to the workers on their own to get their children admitted using this clause.

• Myths, that the parents in the EWS do not want to send their children to school and that children from this section cannot perform, have been broken.

• The resistance of the private schools was highlighted.

• Lastly, we have been able to implement the concept of a welfare state as defined in the Constitution of India [8] - a supreme form of correction from the first principles of India.

• The community empowerment will fix up the role of community in improving the conditions prevailing in Education system.

Back Ground note for Economically Weaker Section (EWS) Quota (2008)


There are 1160 public schools in Delhi, out of which around 397 schools have allotted land at subsidized rates from the Government on the condition of providing free education to underprivileged children. The agreement between the Government and schools availing of concessionary land rates was that the underprivileged children would be given fair and equal education without any prejudice and discrimination. However, no school has abided by this agreement.
Social Jurist filed a petition (W.P. (C) 3156/2002) in the Delhi High Court and a judgment was passed on 20th January 2004 which ordered schools who had been allotted land from Government, to give admission to children of unprivileged sections of society. The Court further ordered that in case its order was not followed, these schools would be derecognized, and lease deed provided to the schools would be cancelled. The High Court had also instructed the Education Department of Delhi to immediately issue rules and regulation pertaining to the admission procedure of unprivileged children.
Success in admission for session 2005-06, 2006-07, 2007-08
In July 2005 Delhi Govt. has published an order related to admission of the children belonging to economically weaker section in many newspapers, in which they have mentioned the guidelines for such admission. Therefore we realized that it was a good opportunity for the poor by which they can also give free and good education to their children in public schools.
Therefore for the admission for session2005-06 we spread the awareness among the people about such orders. In session 2005-06 we were able to admit around 45 children in three public schools of north east district. For session 2006-07 and 2007-08 we started off by spreading the awareness of this reservation clause in the JJ Clusters and Resettlement Colonies of North East, East and South Districts of Delhi. Many parents came forward to get ready for the admission process.
The whole lobby of management of different schools wanted to take stay from the courts on this reservation clause. Parents of the ‘rich’ children felt uneasy about having ‘such’ children in the same class; the teachers assumed that these children were not capable. The management of the public schools was under such resistance to educate Indian children was unimaginable!
The admission which were done in the sessions were not so easy The parents faced many problems in seeking the admission under this quota. The parents were not allowed to enter the school even. Several complaints were sent to the Deputy Director of Education of the Districts, and Director of Education. After filing the complaints when no action was taken against the school applications under the Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005 were filed for follow-up of complaints. All these problems came in to notice of the Chief Information commissioner during the hearing of those cases, therefore commission has also recommended departmental inquiry against some deputy directors of education.
Eventually, in the AY 2006-07 around 180 children and in AY 2007-08 around 400 children were able to get admission in public schools, who would have never dreamt of going to such schools.
Our efforts regarding admission for current session
We have been successfully working on this issue for three years. Therefore, now we wish to take up this issue at a wider level through out the Capital, so that we can spread awareness among the people in every part of Delhi. As a first step in this direction, we drafted a manual comprising each and every detail regarding the admission process.
We have organised a meeting in collaboration with Nehru memorial Museum and Library at Teen Murti and invited many NGOs working in Delhi, to discuss on the current policy of the Delhi Government on access of Economically Weaker Families to public schools. This meeting was also attended by Mr Wajahad Habibullah (Chief Information Commissioner), Mrs. Shanta Sinha (Chairperson, Protection of Child Rights Commission) and Mrs Mridula Mukherjee (Director, Nehru Memorial Museum and Library) Mr. Shekhar Singh (former convener of NCPRI)
Collaboration with Delhi Government: We had organized awareness camp with collaboration of Delhi Govt. in many DC Office complexes in different district. Hundreds of people approached to these camps regarding the admission procedure.
Help line Number: We have started a help line to guide the procedure for admission under EWS category. This help line Number was published in Newspapers like Navbharat Times, Amar Ujala, Dainik Bhaskar. In a span of two months we received around 1000 phone calls from all over Delhi regarding the enquiry of admissions process under EWS quota. The parents were guided about the procedure of admission and simultaneously they were guided about the process of complaints also.
Networking and Advocacy with NGOs: We are also networking with other NGOs like YMCA, ISST, Prabhatara, Amba Foundation, Social Jurist, Astha, Bal Vikas Dhara and Satarak Nagrik Sangathan in Delhi to extend this awareness programme at a wider scale.
Voluntary support by community people: The children who were admitted in the Public schools under EWS quota last year now their parents start mobilizing other people in their community.
Camps organised in different colonies: We organised awareness camps in different colonies and assisted them in completing their documentation process.
Success of this year in field of admission under economically weaker section
1. During our work experience in last three years we realized that the prescribed seats under EWS quota was hardly filled up, but this year especially in two districts i.e. East and North-East (Trans Yamuna) awareness spread among the parents by Pardarshita was to such an extent that, in each school of these two district more than 200 parents approached to the schools, for the admission of their child under this quota, which is quite remarkable in itself.
2. We assisted the parents in filing their complaints in the education department and as a result more than 500 complaints were filed in the department.
3. All these complaints were brought under notice of Hon’ble High court during the hearing held on 19.2.08.and with the result of this High Court had ordered the education department to file the status report of all these complaints. The education department has submitted the status report on 11.3.08
4. During the hearing conducted on 12.3.08 regarding this matter the Hon’ble Court has ordered to issue a contempt notice against these defaulted schools.
5. Now some school authorities are inviting parents for the admission.
6. In current session i.e. 2008-09 more than 300 students have been admitted in public schools.

Wednesday, 13 January 2010

RTI helped in the admission of children belonging to Economically Weaker Sections of society in Private Schools- In-House Report by Ritu


Approximately 397 schools in Delhi have received land from the Government at subsidised rates on the condition that in return these schools reserve seats for the children of Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) in their schools. The allotment of land started in 1967 but none of the schools followed the condition of the Lease Deed. The worse part is that our Government did not take any action against this violation. This matter was highlighted when a PIL was filed in the High Court and the judgement stated that all the schools which had been given land by the government have to follow the conditions of lease deed and simultaneously ordered the Delhi Government to frame rules and guidelines for the admissions.
In 2004 the rules were framed and since then the case is in the High Court and in consecutive proceedings, very good rules were framed.
Despite good orders, however, it was not easy to take admission. The Right to Information played a great role in this admission process, because this is the only tool which could make the department move. Oral requests and written complaints did not make the authorities work, but because of using RTI the department awoke from a long sleep and the admission of poor children become possible in Public Schools.
Case Study I
Shakila, a labourer, who hails from a jhuggi cluster; works in a factory to raise her two children. Her husband lives in another state and does not provide any financial support for the upbringing of the children.
In the beginning of this year when volunteers of Pardarshita initiated mobilising people for admission under EWS quota, she also realised that inspite of her low status in society, her children can avail better quality of education. After being aware of this information, she had approached 5 schools (Dayanand Model School, Arwachin Bharti Bhawan, New Oxford Public school, Siddhartha International School, Vivekanand Public school) where she was insulted by the gatekeepers and was not allowed to enter the school for the admission forms.
She had filed a complaint against these schools with the office of Deputy Director of Education (DDE) but no action was taken for a long period of three months. But suddenly in the month of April her child got admission in three public schools (New Oxford Public school, Dayanand Model School and Vivekanand Public school) and some officials from Education Department (East District) had visited her and requested her to withdraw her complaint.
This had not only happened with Shakila, but with more than 300 parents who were seeking admissions of their wards in public schools under this quota and were denied by the school authorities. The officials who could hardly be bothered to take any action against the complaints have now come out of their air conditioned rooms and started visiting the complainants. Moreover the principals from the schools which had taken money for forms under this scheme have visited the slum and returned their money. This had become possible only because of the complaints followed by the RTI applications which insist the officials to come out from their AC rooms to the jhuggi cluster of these people. In the RTI application they have asked for:
1. the daily progress report on their complaints which they have filed with the department,
2. the enquiry report which the department was supposed to do on her complaint.
Although she did not get the reply, the government machinery moved and admission process started
Case Study II
Radha, Malti, Foolbano and Afsaan got their children admitted in a reputed school in East Delhi but the administration asked them to submit Rs.3466/- as admission fees if they were to attend classes. These perplexed women requested the principal, and they showed the order by the Education Department in which it was mandated that children from unprivileged section of society do not have to pay any registration fees, prospectus fees or tuition fees, but the school did not concede to it.
When these women were left with no hope they approached the director, the Deputy Director and an officer of the Education Department with a written complaint. They would meet these officers everyday after filing these complaints. Even after 2 months of the lodging of these complaints their children were not allowed to sit in the classes.
After all these efforts, these women enquired of the Director of Education Dept., Mr. Vijay Kumar, under the Right to Information. They asked that in response to the complaint filed by them about a school demanding Rs.3466 from unprivileged children, which officer is working upon the matter and they also demanded the investigation report. They also asked for a photocopy of the show cause notice issued to the school and their response to the Education department based on the complaint filed by them.
After filing this complaint under RTI Act, we got the response within 15 days that they have investigated that school has not only seeking money from them but has collected money from 16 other underprivileged students. On the basis of the complaint departmental action is being taken against the concerned officer of the Education Department and the school has been ordered that students be given admission within one week and the Education Department be notified about it. The next day, the school authorities themselves came to request these people to send their children to school. With that, they sent a written notice to 16 people who paid Rs.3466 to come and collect that money from the school
In the last three years more than 700 children had been admitted because of the employment of RTI.

Tuesday, 12 January 2010

Updates on Financial Aid, March 2009

Accordance to the notification dated 25/1/07 the students admitted against free seats in such school shall get financial assistance, at par with the students of Government school, for expenditure on account of uniform and books; and the financial assistance referred to in first proviso shall be reimbursed by the Education Department and disbursed through the Head of School.

But till December 2008 nothing was done neither at the level of Court nor at the level of education department. In the month of December a meeting was conducted with the parents whose children were admitted under EWS quota in public schools and the parents decided to file individual RTI application for seeking the status of reimbursement in lieu of Books and uniform, and around 122 parents filed RTI application in East, North East and south West A District.
Now the students have received a cheque of Rs. 580/- for primary and Rs.630 for middle classes.
We would also like to share that the maximum number of admission has been done in the district of East & North East where Pardarshita has been working consistently for last couple of years.

Updates for the admission under EWS quota, April 2008

Dear friend
Greetings!
Shakila, a labourer, who hails from a jhuggi cluster; works in a factory to raise her two children. Her husband lives in another state and does not provide any financial support for the upbringing of the children.
In the beginning of this year when volunteers of Pardarshita initiated mobilizing people for admission under EWS quota, she also realized that despite of her low status in the society her children can avail better quality of education. After being aware of this information, she had approached 5 schools (Daya nand Model School, Arwachin Bharti Bhawan, New Oxford Public school, Siddhartha International School, Vivekanand Public school) where she was insulted by the gatekeepers and was not allowed to enter the school for the admission forms.
She had filed a complaint against these schools with the office of Deputy Director of Education (DDE) but no action was taken for a long period of three months. But suddenly in the month of April her child got admission in three public schools (New Oxford Public school, Daya nand Model School and Vivekanand Public school) and some officials from Education Department (East District) had visited her and requested her to withdraw her complaint.
This had not only happened with Shakila, but this had happened with more than 100 parents who were seeking admissions of their wards in public schools under this quota and were denied by the school authorities. The officials who used to sit in their air conditioned offices and hardly bothered to take any action against the complaints now have come out of their air conditioned rooms and started visiting the complainants. Moreover the principals from the schools which had taken money for forms under this scheme have visited the slum and returned their money.
Further it has been noticed that many big schools like DAV have offered bribe to the parents who have filed complaint against their schools and requested the parents kindly withdraw their complaint, but the parents refused to take a single penny.
This has become possible because during the admission process around 1000 parents called up on pardarshita helpline and discussed about their problems which they were facing in admission process. They were assisted by Pardarshita in filing the written complaints with director and deputy director of education. When all these complaints brought under the notice of Hon̢۪ble High court and thereafter the proactive decision given by Hon̢۪ble High Court against these defaulted schools by issuing notice for contempt of Court. Further the high Court has stated on 3rd April 2008 before issuing contempt notice to defaulted schools, it is required to take strict action against some officials of education department.
With Warm Regards,
Ritu Mehra

Updates for the admission under EWS quota, March 2008

Dear Asha /Seattle/Munich/Delhi members,
Here is a latest update on the Admissions. The Delhi High Court on Wednesday issued contempt of court notices to as many as 52 private schools here for refusing free admissions to students belonging to economically weaker sections of society despite giving affidavits to this effect to the Court last year. The links of the news coverage is also given in the mail below. A good move in all what has been happening on this front so far. Let's hope that these actions are not covering up a larger and dirtier scheme of the Pvt Schools. Though Ritu just called to tell that the pvt schools are now calling up parents to get the children admitted in their schools.... Great work done by Mr Ashok Agrawal, and the Pardarshita team - Rajiv, Ritu, Rekha... All the updates are now present on the project website: http://www.ashanet.org/projects/project-view.php?p=678 From Asha's perspective, I think we might need to take this issue up and build some opinion around it in our area of influence. Start some debates and discussions around it. Right to Information applications were filed in other states in India about the existance of the clause in other states in India. Some responses have started coming in - follow ups have to be done. Please cascade this info as appropriate -Uday -- "Desh badalna hai toh pehele khud ko badlo" http://www.ashanet.org/projects-new/documents/678/listofschoolwhichwasfiledincourt.xls ----- Weitergeleitete Mail ---- Gesendet: Donnerstag, den 13. März 2008, 22:37:56 Uhr Betreff: Up dates for the admission under EWS quota Dear Friend Greetings There has been a great development in the drive for admission under EWS quota. It had been noticed that the set drive was not giving desired results. On pardarshita helpline the parents who had approached with their grievances for not getting the forms from the schools, so we had advised those parents that they should file their complaints in the office of their district deputy director of education or director of education. More than 500 complaints against 54 schools have been filed in the department of education but no action has been taken by the department. All these complaints were brought under notice of Hon’ble High court during the hearing held on 19.2.08.and with the result of this High Court had ordered the education department to file the status report of all these complaints. The education department has submitted the status report on 11.3.08. On dated 12.3.08 hearing was conducted regarding this matter and the Hon’ble Court has ordered to issue a contempt notice against these defaulted schools. Advocate Sh. Ashok Aggarwal (Social Jurist) has played an important role in achieving such success, because of their support all matter was brought under the notice of Hon’ble Court . We and all parents are grate ful to them. . Many leading news papers have covered this; we are enclosing the links of the paper as well as the list of schools against which the Hon’ble court has issued notice for contempt of Court With regards Rajiv


Additional Information- LIST of schools, filed in Court 

Updates for the admission under EWS quota, Feb 2008


Dear Friends,
From our previous mails as you perhaps may be aware about the problems that parents from Economically Weaker Section are facing for the admission of their wards; in public schools
Till now more than 500 complaints of around 45 public schools from different districts of Delhi have been filed with the Education Department and a copy of the same has also been filed with the office of Education Secretary by Pardarshita with a request to take action against those schools for which the complaints have been submitted in her office and according to education notification kindly forward the registration forms to the concerned schools.
In the same context we have been trying to take appointment with the Education Secretary since 25th January2008. We tried to contact her through email, fax and made several calls in her office for several times, but we have not been able to get the appointment till date.
We are hereby enclosing the compiled data of the complaints.
With warm regards
Ritu Mehra 9899358835
PARDARSHITA              
Compiled data of the complaints filed by parents
1 St. Lawrence School, Dilshad Garden North East
The school informed that we are not giving admission to the children belonging to EWS, but the parents can enquire in January and when the parents approached in the month of January they were informed that we don’t give admission under EWS quota. Simultaneously they informed to some parents that our quota for EWS is full.
For the last three years this school has not given registration forms under EWS
2 Nutan Vidya Mandir, Dilshad Garden North East
The school refused to give the registration forms beyond the entry level. The residence of the applicant was with in the radius of 1-1.5 km but the school authorities did not issue the registration forms. Despite of showing the income certificate issued by the SDM, the school authorities refused to accept the registration forms and asked them to give ration card.
3 Gyan Deep School, Yamuna Vihar North East
School was not aware of EWS admissions. They informed the parents that they do not have any forms for EWS.
4 Siddhartha International School, Dilshad Garden North East
The school asked the parents why they want to get their child study in this school, somehow if they were able to get their child admitted in Public School but next year your child will be expelled from the school. They stated that we do not give registration forms to poor. Although the school in dilshad garden had been given land from the Govt. yet the authorities misguide the parents that you can approach to our other branch in Loni for the admission under EWS quota, which is around four km away from the residence of the willing parents.
5 Hans Raj Samarak School North East
Despite of instuctions from the court that reg forms will be distributed from 15th Dec to 31st Dec the forms were not given to parents and different dates were given to parents and when the parents approached to school on those mentioned dates they denied to give the forms
6 Green Ways Sr.Sec. School North East
The school stated that we do not give form for the children belonging to EWS category you can go to some other school.
To some parents the authorities stated that our seats are full for EWS Quota.
7 Flora Dales Public School North East
As it is clearly mentioned in orders of Education department that no fees would be charged from the parents who are seeking admission under this quota yet the authorities asked the parents until unless you will pay the fees we wont give you any forms
8 Mother Teresa Public School East
Parents were not allowed to enter the school, some were given different dates but when the parents went to school, the authorities denied to give the form and stated that we do not give any forms to the poor
9 Sai Memorial School East
The school stated that we do not have any seats and did not give the forms
10 Mayur Public School East
Authorities asked for unnecessary documents like: electricity/water bills, those who produced income certificate they were asked for ration cards. One of the parent produce pan card but the authorities stated that you do not fall under EWS category. Forms were not given to many parents despite of producing all the required documents
11 Mayo International School East
Neither the acknowledgements were not given to parents nor were they informed about the date of draw.
12 Lovely Public School East
Despite of order from the court that reg. forms will be distributed from 15th Dec to 31st Dec the forms were not given to parents
13 DAV School, Sreshtha Vihar East
The school stated that we do not give any forms to poor
14 DAV School, Mausam Vihar East
The school stated that we don’t have seats for EWS
15 Bal Mandir Sr. Sec School East
The school stated that we do not have forms you can take the reg. forms from some other school
16 Preet Public School East
The forms were not given to parents and they were told to come after 1 month
17 ASN Public School East
The parents were not allowed to enter the school and forms were not given to parents
18 Arwachin Bharti Bhawan, Vivek Vihar East
Neither the acknowledgement was given to parents nor they were informed about the date of draw.
19 New Oxford School East
The school stated that we do not have forms you can take the reg. forms from some other school
20 Bal Bhawan Public School East
The school stated that We don’t have seats in higher classes.
21 Modern Montasary Public School East
The authorities denied to give reg. form and asked the parents that if they want to get their child admitted than they have to purchase the forms
22 Bharti Public School East
The school stated that we do not give admission under EWS quota and in case if we give forms to you but your ward's admission would not be processed.
23 Universal Public School East
The school authorities gave different dates to parents and when the parents approached to school on those mentioned dates they denied to give the forms
24 Vivekanad Public School East
There is no seat for EWS in our school
25 Kamal Convent School West-B
The authorities informed that we do not give forms under EWS quota you can take forms from some other school
26 Banasthali School West-B
The school stated that we don’t have seats under EWS quota
27 St. Peter Convent School West-B
The school stated that we do not give any forms to children who live in jhuggies
28 St.Cicelia School West-B
The school stated that we do not give form for the children belonging to EWS category you can go to some other school.
29 Sachdeva International School West-B
The forms were not given to parents
30 Ved Vyas DAV School West-B
The parents were not allowed to enter the school and forms were not given to parents
31 Rama Krishna Sr. Sec. School West-B
The forms were not given to those parents who were having BPL ration cards.
32 Prerna Public School West-B
The forms were not given to those parents who were having BPL ration cards and asked for income certificate
33 Oxford Public School West-B
The school stated that we do not give any forms to children who live in jhuggies and simultaneously asked for income certificate.
34 New Delhi Public School West-B
The forms were not given to parents’ dispite of showing BPL ration card and income certificate.
35 Mamta Modern School West-B
The school stated that we do not have forms you can take the reg. forms from some other school
36 Kamal Public School West-B
Our seats are full and we do not give admissions under EWS quota.
37 Holy Inocent Public School West-B
Our seats are full and we do not give admissions under EWS quota.
38 Columbia Foundation Public School West-B
The forms were not given to those parents who were having BPL ration cards and asked for income certificate
39 Adarsh Public School West-B
The forms were not given to parents
40 Pusa Public School West-B
The school stated that we do not have forms you can take the reg. forms from some other school
41 Hill grove School south west A
Parents were asked to deposit Rs. 7000 for the admission under EWS quota
42 Green field School south west A
The authorities were not giving free reg. forms to parents of EWS category.

Updates for Admission under Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) Quota, Jan 2008

Dear Friends,
Greetings from Pardarshita!
Approximately 397 schools in Delhi have received land from the Government at subsidized rates on the condition that in return these schools reserve seats for the children of Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) in their schools. The allotment of land started since 1967 but none of the school followed the condition of Lease Deed. The worse part is that our Government did not take any action against this violation. This matter was highlighted when Social Jurist filed PIL in High Court and Hon̢۪ble Court in its judgement stated that all the schools which had been given land by Govt. have to follow the condition of lease deed and simultaneously ordered Delhi Government to frame rules and guidelines for the admissions. http://164.100.51.18/dhcorder/dhcqrydisp_o.asp?pn=117969&yr=2004
In 2004 the rules were framed and since than the case is in High Court and in consecutive proceedings very good rules were framed. Despite of good orders it was not easy to take the admission. http://164.100.51.18/dhcorder/dhcqrydisp_j.asp?pn=2070&yr=2007
In last two years more than 500 children were admitted in these Public Schools and credit for these admissions goes to Right to Information Act only. In the light of these good orders we were expecting that it would be easier for the people to get their child admit in these schools for the current session.
In this direction we put our efforts and started a Help Line which was published in many leading News papers like Navbharat Times, Rashtriya Sahara, Amar Ujala. On this Help Line we are continuously getting many phone calls.
In collaboration with Delhi Government we were able to organise awareness camps in D C complexes and thousands of people approached to these camp to enquire about the process of admission.
The admission process started from 15th Dec07 and will last till 7th Jan08. But till today that is 5th Jan 08 most of the schools have not issued Registration Form to the parents. In this context hundreds of complaints have been filed in the Education Department. We were expecting that admission process would be smooth this year in comparison to last year, but the situation is quite reverse because of the hearing conducted in Supreme Court and the order which the Supreme Court has passed in favour of Public Schools. http://courtnic.nic.in/supremecourt/temp/pc%2012275-1227607p.txt
So what ever pressure was built on the schools and the department has vanished away. Now the schools are free to do admission at their own wish.
We have assisted people in filing the complaints in the office of Education Department also. Now your valuable suggestions could give a new direction for this issue.
With warm regards
Rajiv, Ritu and Rekha
PARDARSHITA

Invitation for half-day program at Nehru Memorial Library on EWS and their schooling, Nov 2007

Dear Uday
Greeting from Pardarshita!
Pardarshita is an organization based in east Delhi. Pardarshita sees itself as playing an instrumental role in a collective effort to fight corruption and ensure transparency and accountability in the public governance systems. In our efforts we hope we are able to empower the marginalized sections to improve their lives and livelihoods.
Our goal is to spread awareness about Right to Information and empower common people specifically the poor and working class to use the RTI and other accountability mechanisms to ensure access to his/her rights and entitlements.
As you perhaps know, the Delhi High Court issued order, dated 30th May 2007, which provides for minimum of 15% of the available seats in Public Schools that have received land at concessional rates from the Government should be reserved for the children from Economically Weaker Families. This is in continuation of a long-standing policy decision of Delhi Government and DDA to make reservation of such seats, apart of the contract for leasing out land to schools.
Unfortunately, despite a policy and the recent High Court orders, Economically Weaker Families in Delhi are still finding it very difficult to ensure access by their children to public schools.
Pardarshita has been working on this issue for over a year now. In our work we have met with some success however, not without several challenges. We would like to invite you to a discussion on the current policy of the Delhi Government on access of Economically Weaker Families to public schools.
The discussion will be focused on –
· The present implementation successes and bottlenecks of the policy and High Court orders;
· Developing a localized strategy to enable families to avail of the policy benefits; and
· To suggest changes for the way forward.
We would be honoured if you could take time out to participate in a half-day meeting organized by Pardarshita in collaboration with Nehru Memorial Museum and Library and Satarak Nagrik Sangathan. You are requested to contribute to its deliberations on the morning of Saturday 17th November 2007 from 9.30 a.m at the Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, Teenmurti, New Delhi. The meeting will be followed by lunch.
We hope this meeting can contribute towards the preparation of an action plan that can make a significant contribution to broadening the base of school education for Economically Weaker Families.
Looking forward to a positive response.
With Warm Regards
Rajiv Kumar
PARDARSHITA

Press release regarding HELPLINE for the admission under EWS Quota, Nov 2007

Dear Friends,
In Delhi around 394 schools have acquired free land from the D.D.A and L & D.O on the condition of providing free education to unprivileged children of society. It was agreed that they would be given fair and equal education as children from privileged section of society without any prejudice and discrimination, but no school has abided to this condition.
Social Jurist filed a petition (W.P.(C) 3156/2002) in high court about this matter, and a judgment was passed on this on 20 January 2004 which ordered that schools who have acquired free land from government, they have to give admission to children of unprivileged and section of society, in case this order not be abided these schools would ceased to be recognized and also land provided to the schools would be seized. After this in consecutive Court preceding the Hon̢۪ble High Court has passed many good orders. If this order would be implemented completely than around 1,50,000 children belonging to under privileged families would get admission in 394 schools.
Social Jurist and Pardarshita are continuously tracking all these admission processes and we have come to know that due to lack of awareness about rules and regulations issued from time to time by respective Government authorities people have faced many difficulties in seeking admission for their ward in the schools, therefore to extend support to the people Pardarshita and Social Jurist is going to start a HELPLINE. By contacting on below mentioned numbers they will not only be made aware about regulations but also they shall be assisted to get the admission in proposed schools.
HELPLINE No. are 20033988, 9910349898, 9868529459
Address 478-479, Lawyers̢۪ Chambers,
Western Wing, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi-110054
With Regards
Ashok Aggarwal Advocate
(Social Jurist) 9811101923
Ritu Mehra
(Pardarshita) 9899358835

Site Visit Report

Date of visit: 10.1.09
Visit done by: M.R. Ravi, IIT Delhi Professor and volunteer for Asha-Delhi
The project is in operation under Asha Delhi. The project steward keeps changing, but the Asha Volunteer who has constantly beein in touch with the project, monitoring the project and making sure that payments reach the Pardarshita volunteers is Uday Gosain. The work of the field volunteers, from the voluntary group Pardarshita (erstwhile members of the voluntary group Parivartan, started by Magsaysay Awardee Arvind Kejriwal along with some friends), involves interacting with communities, primarily lodged in slums or unauthorized colonies, for:
• Making them aware of their rights, principally towards the reservation available for the economically weaker sections (EWS) in all the private schools of Delhi, especially those which were given land at concessional rates by the Delhi Development Authority.
• Helping them with preparing the documents they might need to secure admission for their children in such schools: proof of residence, birth certificate / affidavit, etc.
• In case the schools refuse to give them application forms, refuses admission or poses other bureaucratic hassles, supporting them to lodge a complaint with the Education Directorate, and following up the complaint
with a Right to Information petition that ensures that the Education Directorate takes action on the complaint promptly.
• Monitoring the children admitted to schools in the past to ensure that the schools do not start eventually charging them fees of any kind, ensuring that the Governmental aid available for books and uniforms for
EWS children are made available to the parents through the school, and meeting the school authorities from time to time in case of need.
The project has now completed three years, and a record of direct beneficiaries in the form of children admitted to the schools through the efforts of this project have been documented and have been kept in the
project website. There is no direct and simple means to verify this data.
But the visit to a couple of communities and talking to Ritu and Rajiv, the Pardarshita volunteers, gave a lot of confidence. Here is a brief account of the site visit.
Originally, I had planned to include a visit to one of the schools to see for myself the EWS children in the school and interact with the teachers to know how they were doing, but somehow the date which suited me happened to be a second Saturday, holiday for schools. So, I had to be content with the visit to the office of Pardarshita in New Seemapuri and to the communities in New Seemapuri and Rajiv Camp. The visit was announced to Ritu in advance. I found no point in doing a surprise check, since in a project of this kind, nothing can be fabricated for the visit.
I reached the office of Pardarshita at F-221 New Seemapuri at 11.45 a.m., after a metro ride upto the last station: Dilshad Garden and then a cycle rickshaw ride for about 10 minutes. After a bit of looking around and asking people, I reached the innocuous first floor office of Pardarshita, in the narrow streets of New Seemapuri area. About 8-10 women from a nearby community were sitting around Ritu on the floor in the verandah, and I went into the office room which had a computer, a couple of almirahs full of files neatly arranged, and no furniture, accompanied by Rajiv. He was talking to me about the work they were doing and the areas they were working. The work started in the East District of Delhi and covered North-East as well. In each District they were covering several colonies or communities, which comprise of small or large residential areas of EWS people: the New Seemapuri colony seemed to house more than 50 families, while the Rajiv camp looked relatively smaller to me, though I did not ask about the size of these colonies. East District includes five or six such colonies, and accounts for the largest area covered by the team. There are similarly some communities in the north east district and Shriniwas Puri District. In the past couple of years the activity has spread to South West A district (RK Puram) and North West District (Vikas Puri) with other volunteers, Prakash et al.
During the last school admission year, Pardarshita carried out active campaigns in Metro stations, local administrative offices such as RTO office, Ration card office, etc, by placing posters and distributing notices about the availability of reservation for EWS children in public schools and the possibility of availing of the admission, along with contact telephone numbers. This resulted in a really widespread response, and a large number of children applied. Pardarshita had its hands full with complaints, RTI petitions, etc., and a large fraction of these children got admitted. This also resulted in spreading of the message by word of mouth, and the project got to the status of a movement in some colonies. Now they have no idea how many children have actually benefitted, but the data presented in the project website is only those who took the help of Pardarshita directly.
Rajiv remarked, however, that all the effect that the work is able to have is local and individual. Although last year’s increase in number of complaints made the Delhi Govt assure centralization of EWS admissions to
public schools, no such action has taken place yet. Court cases send directives to schools, RTI petitions are on complaints against schools in specific cases. The effect would be more generic and permanent if the directive is to the Government, and the Government is held legally accountable.
Pardarshita has helped people get admissions to MCD and Delhi Govt schools as well: although on paper these schools are supposed to admit anyone who wants to be admitted, they pose unnecessary hassles to parents to minimize their own work. Pardarshita intervened and got about 250-300 children in the New Seemapuri area admitted in the 2 Govt schools and 1 MCD school in the area. The intervention in one Government school was quite fruitful, thanks to the cooperation of the new principal of the school.
I interacted with the women who were sitting with Ritu in the office, and understood that they were very happy with the fact that their children are now going to good schools. One of them remarked, that now they can rest assured that their children would be educated. The public schools in the vicinity are not enormously elite schools, and they cater to middle class population. So, expenses such as occasional picnics or class tours do not pinch the parents’ pockets too much, and the parents on their part are willing to part with that kind of money once in a while to make their children not feel inferior to their peers.
I then went to New Seemapuri colony. Ritu and Rajiv took us to a gali (street) where most children had been admitted to public schools. A majority of children from this street were going to the Hans Raj Smarak School. I spoke to a couple of class III and IV children, and found that their basic English vocabulary and arithmetic was good. All of them told me about their favourite teachers at school and why they liked them. The most common reasons were: “she teaches very well” and “she speaks to us with love and care”. Often, it happened to be the Arithmetic teacher. In one or two cases, it was the Hindi or English teachers. I could get a feeling that the children were in good and caring hands at school. The kind of love and respect Ritu and Rajiv commanded in the community said it all: here is a group of genuine people, caring for the EWS communities.
Ritu is an MA, BEd, former teacher, now dedicated her life to service, full-time. Rajiv is also a graduate, working full-time: at the time when I met him, his support had gotten over and he did not know for sure when
the next funding would be available. Subsequently, I accompanied Ritu to the Rajiv Camp. Unlike New Seemapuri, which had a predominantly Muslim population, this place had a majority of Hindus. The problems were similar, and what a support they found in these volunteers. This colony had two new schools into which children’s admission had begun, so there were more teething troubles. All these people have such great faith in Ritu and her colleagues. Only, these people were farther away from Pardarshita office to frequent them for help. I talked to Rohini, a class VIII student, who has been going to this school since class VI. I asked her if she could compare her previous school and the present one, she said dismissively that the present one was far superior. When I persisted asking why she thought so, she gave me a look as if asking me why I did not understand the obvious, and said in a matter of fact way, “ Here the teachers are caring, and they teach well”.
When I walked back to the Metro station, Ritu said in a thoughtful tone: I have been brought up in New Seemapuri, and went to college from here: but never knew that there were so many people living in here! And I thought, “thanks to you and Asha, I also got to meet them. Hats off to you people!” I believe that for the output they are producing, the investment Asha is doing is really nothing at all. This is a genuine set of people, and they have made so much difference in the past few years to the lives of so many people. This project should continue. While spreading it to other regions, care should be taken that we get people of the same level of commitment. If this is done, then this can soon become a mass movement that would sustain itself: I am sure that it would produce one Ritu and one Rajiv in each of these colonies: that would be the culmination of this project in the real sense.

Friday, 8 January 2010

Guidelines for EWS Admissions 25 January 2007

(TO BE PUBLISHED IN PART IV OF THE DELHI GAZETTE - ORDINARY)

GOVERNMENT OF NATONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI
(EDUCATION DEPARTMENT)
OLD SECRETARIAT, DELHI – 110054
No.F/DE/15/ACT/2006/424                                                                                                     Dated: 25/01/07
NOTIFICATION
No.F/DE/15/ACT/2006/_______ - In exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 (18 of 1973) read with rule 43 of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973, and in supersession of Order No.PS/DE/2004/10496-11595 dated 27th April, 2004, issued by the Director of Education, Delhi, except as respect things done or omitted to be done before such supersession, the Lt. Governor of the National Capital Territory of Delhi, hereby makes the following order, namely:-
1. Short title and Commencement. –
(1) This order may be called the Delhi School Education (Free seats for students belonging to Economically Weaker Sections) Order, 2006
(2) This Order shall come into force from the academic session 2007-2008

PART – I
2. Definitions. – In this order, unless the context otherwise requires;-
“Act” means the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 (18 to 1973);
“class” includes the entry level class such as pre primary or primary class;
“child belonging to economically weaker section” means a child whose parents have annual income of less than one lakh rupees from all sources and who have been staying in Delhi for the last five years;
“free ship cell” means a free ship cell set up under paragraph 6 of this order, in each district under the control of
Deputy Director;
“management” means the management of unaided recognized private school, imparting education in Delhi, which has been allotted land for such school by the Government agencies, such as Delhi Development Authority, Land and Development Office and the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi etc.;
“rules” means the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973;
3. Free seats for student belonging to economically weaker section. –
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in the terms and conditions of the lease deed pertaining to the land allotted to it for such school, the management shall provide free seats, not less than twenty percent, of total seats, in each class to the child belonging to economically weaker section.
(2) No separate or exclusive class or shift shall be arranged for imparting education to the students admitted against free seats mentioned in sub-paragraph (1)
(3) No tuition fee or any other charges or fee or fund, other than earmarked levies, shall be charged from the student admitted against the free seat.
(4) The students admitted against the free seats shall get financial assistance, at par with the students of Government school, for expenditure on account of uniform and books.
(5) The financial assistance referred to in sub paragraph (4) shall be reimbursed by the Education Department and disbursed through the Head of School.
(6) The management shall not charge any fees or fund or charges of any kind from the other students in lieu of providing free seats to the students of economically weaker sections.
4. Application for admission against free seat. –
(1) The parent seeking admission of his child against the free seat shall submit the following documents along with the application, namely:-
Annual Income Certificate of the earning parent, issued by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate; and
Ration Card of the family, Voter Identity Card of parents, or Birth Certificate of the child.
(Explanation: The parents of the student admitted against free seat shall submit a self declaration of annual income every year for continuation of free seat in the school)
(2) The application along with the documents mentioned in sub-paragraph (1), shall be submitted to the concerned school and in case of refusal by the school, to the Deputy Director of Education of the concerned district, where such school is situated.
(3) No registration fee, including charges of prospectus shall be charged from the parents/child applying against free seat.
(4) Any parent, aggrieved by the action of the management, may file a complaint in writing to the freeship cell, addressed to the concerned Deputy Director.
5. Manner of admission against free seats.
(1) The management shall display the number of total seats and the free seats available in each class, on the notice board in the school and shall also notify the same to the concerned Deputy Director of Education by the 31st December for entry-level classes, and by the 15th March for other classes, for each academic session.
(2) The management shall also notify the date of submission of applications for admissions against the free seats in entry level or other classes and the last date of admissions.
(3) The information mentioned in sub-paragraph (1) and (2) shall also be made available on the website of the concerned school and website of the Education Department, Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi.
(4) The management shall acknowledge the application for admission against free seats and shall assign each application a registration number. The acknowledgement receipt shall also indicate the dates of display of admission list on the notice board and the date of admission.
(5) The admissions against the free seats shall be regulated by the Head of the school as per the provisions of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 and the Rules framed thereunder, subject to the provisions of this Order.
(6) In case the number of applications for admission against the free seats in entry-level classes exceeds the number of seats available, the admission shall be made by draw of lots in the presence of applicant parents and a nominee of Education Department, not below the rank of Vice Principal. The date of draw would be intimated to all the parents reasonably in advance.
(7) In case the number of application against the free seats in other classes exceeds the number of seats available, the admission shall be made as per merit in the admission test to be conducted in the 1st week of April by the school.
(8) In case the number of applications for admission against the free seats is below the number of seats available, the admission shall be made from the available applications and the vacant seats shall be re-notified for inviting further applications and also be notified to the freeship cell for forwarding further application.
(9) The management shall file an annual return in the Freeship Cell of the concerned district regarding number of admissions made etc. by the 15th September of the academic year.
6. Freeship Cell. –
(1) There shall be freeship cell in each districts and the concerned Deputy Director (Education) shall be the controlling officer of the freeship cell.
(2) The parent seeking admission of the child against free seats, may in case of refusal by school, submit the application in the freeship cell, for further transmission to the concerned school.
(3) The freeship cell shall maintain the database of such applications and such information shall also be made available on the website of the Education Department.
(4) On the request of management, the freeship cell may forward further applications for admission against free seats.
(5) The freeship cell shall entertain the complaints of aggrieved persons with regard to free seats, in a time bound manner.
(6) The concerned Deputy Director may inspect any school for ensuring the compliance of this order as per sub-section (2) of the section 24 of the Act, and in case any default is noticed, the matter be reported to the Director.
(7) On receipt of report under sub-paragraph (5), the Director may, after giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard, take action under sub-section (4) of section 24 of the Act and/or inform the concerned Government agency, which has allotted the land on concessional rates for taking action against the management for violation of terms and conditions of the lease, as the case may be.

PART – II
7. Saving of admissions already made in compliance of earlier order. –
Notwithstanding supersession of the Order No. No.PS/DE/2004/10496-11595 dated 27th April, 2004, the admissions already made against free seats, in any private recognized school, which has not been allotted land on concessional rates by the Government agencies, shall continue and the studies of such students shall not be disrupted:
Provided that:-
The students admitted against free seats in such school shall get financial assistance, at par with the students of Government school, for expenditure on account of uniform and books; and
The financial assistance referred to in first proviso shall be reimbursed by the Education Department and disbursed through the Head of School.
By order and in the name of the
Lt. Governor of the National
Capital Territory of Delhi
 Sd/-
(MADHUP VYAS)
Joint Secretary (Education)